Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Close Skills Gaps with Verified Training
From identifying capability needs to delivering training and verifying completions - coordinate workforce development that drives verified competency, not just attendance certificates.


Join leaders who adopt the new standard for workforce development
The Gap Between Training Delivery and Workforce Capability
You discover Worker A needs confined space training when they're already assigned to a project starting in 3 days. Scramble to find training, rush the booking, hope they pass, delay project start if they don't.
Meanwhile, 15 other workers across your contractor panel need the same training in the next 60 days - but you don't know it yet because training needs are discovered reactively, one worker at a time.

How Integrated is Your Training Delivery?
Before we show you a better way, take a moment to assess your current reality. How many of these scenarios sound familiar? If you checked 3+, MyPass can help.
Training delivery and compliance tracking happen in separate systems
We discover training needs reactively when projects need workers
Manual processes to update worker profiles after training completion
Difficult to coordinate training across multiple contractors
Workers learn about expiring qualifications too late for efficient re-training
No visibility into training pipeline vs. upcoming capability needs
L&D Integrated with Workforce Compliance
MyPass connects training delivery to verified workforce capability - ensuring training investment translates to deployment-ready workers.
Comprehensive Learning & Development Features
How you use these capabilities depends on your role in the workforce ecosystem
Whether you're an asset owner coordinating training across a contractor supply chain, or a service provider developing your workforce to meet evolving client requirements, MyPass connects training delivery to verified workforce capability. The same integrated system serves different workflows - reducing duplication while building competency.
The Impact of Data-Driven Contractor Management
47%
Increase in training completion rates
35
Fraudulent certificates intercepted monthly (average)
32%
Reduction in administrative time managing contractor compliance

Sign up for our newsletter


Related Solutions for Comprehensive Workforce Management
L&D is most powerful when connected to the systems that identify training needs and measure training impact.
Helping our customers do more
Works With Your Existing Training Systems
Learning Management Systems (LMS)
Clui Learning, other LMS platforms for course delivery
HR Systems
Training records in employee files
ERP Systems
SAP, Oracle integration for contractor records
Site Access Control
Automated compliance checking at gates, access revocation for expired qualifications
Training Providers
Coordinate with external RTOs and corporate training providers
Reporting Tools
Export to PowerBI, Tableau for custom training analytics
Where Does Your Organisation Stand?
L&D practices evolve through predictable stages as organisations move from reactive training delivery to strategic capability building. Most operations start at Stage 1, driven by mandatory compliance training and hope that courses prevent incidents. Progressive organisations advance through coordination and integration before reaching Stage 4 - where training investment directly drives verified workforce capability and measurable business outcomes. Understanding where you are today helps clarify the path forward. Which stage best describes your current approach?
"We Deliver Mandatory Training"
- Training driven by compliance requirements and incident responses
- Limited coordination between training delivery and workforce planning
- Attendance tracked, but effectiveness uncertain
- Workers receive certificates, but gap remains between training and verified capability
- Training treated as cost center, not strategic investment
Typical Trigger to Advance: Repeated discovery that workers completed training but qualifications weren't reflected in compliance systems, mobilization delays from training coordination gaps, or recognition that training investment doesn't translate to improved deployment readiness.
1
"We Track Training Completion"
- Centralized tracking of training enrollment and completion
- Better visibility into who's completed what training
- Still disconnected from operational workforce planning
- Manual processes to update compliance status after training
- Limited ability to measure training effectiveness or ROI
Typical Trigger to Advance: Operational pressure from discovering training needs too late, inefficiency from manual compliance status updates after training, or desire to demonstrate training ROI through operational metrics rather than completion rates alone.
2
"We Coordinate Training with Operations"
- Training planning aligned with project timelines
- Proactive identification of expiring qualifications
- Some integration between training and compliance systems
- Better than reactive delivery but still gaps in verification
- Measuring training through operational outcomes emerging
Typical Trigger to Advance: Need for seamless integration between training delivery and compliance verification, desire to measure training effectiveness through deployment readiness improvement, or requirement to demonstrate verified capability to clients/regulators, not just attendance certificates.
3

"Strategic Capability Building"
- Training needs identified proactively through skills gap analysis
- Seamless integration: training completion → verification → compliance update
- Automated coordination across contractors and workforce
- Export data for training ROI measurement
- Strategic capability building before opportunities arise
- Unified view of training across direct workforce and contractor supply chain
Key Differentiator: You're not asking "Did they complete training?" You're measuring "Did training close our skills gaps and improve workforce deployment readiness?" through exported data analysis."
4
Award-winning platform
Industry-recognised innovation transforming how organisations manage workforce compliance and safety
Learning & Development Questions
Does MyPass compete with our members or take ownership of worker data?
No. MyPass operates as neutral infrastructure, not a competing service. Your industry body sets the standards; MyPass provides the verification and portability layer underneath them. Workers - not employers, and not MyPass - own their credential data, which is what allows the platform to stay neutral across asset owners, service providers, and training organisations at once.
How does MyPass work with a framework we've already published?
Your existing competency matrices, qualification requirements, and training pathways are embedded directly into the platform's hiring and verification workflows. Instead of your framework living as a reference PDF that members adopt voluntarily, it becomes the operational standard workers are verified against, and employers hire against - with real-time visibility into how consistently it's actually being used across your sector.
What did the Clean Energy Council partnership actually involve?
MyPass was engaged as the technology provider for CEC's Clean Energy JobReady program in Victoria and Queensland. MyPass built industry-agreed training matrices for solar, battery, and onshore wind trade roles, with real-time verification against CEC standards and a free digital Skills Passport for workers - reducing onboarding time and duplicate document uploads across projects for CEC members.
Still have questions?
Didn’t find the answers you’re looking for? Get in touch with the team at MyPass
Get in touch
See Learning & Development in Action
ISO27001 Certified
Description
Trusted by 1,500+ organisations
Description
.webp)
The latest from MyPass
Show most viewed items from Blog, events/webinars, whitepaper/ebook

.png)
.avif)
.avif)

.png)










.png)
